—Audit & Assurance
Internal Financial Controls (IFC) Review
Evaluation of design and operating effectiveness of financial controls with a gap and remediation plan.
Handled by a practising Chartered Accountant or Company Secretary.
Scope of work
Evaluation of design and operating effectiveness of financial controls with a gap and remediation plan.
Key deliverables
- IFC report
- control gap list
- remediation plan
Governing law
Companies Act, 2013; ICAI Guidance Note on IFC over Financial Reporting
Frequency
Annual
REGISTRATION ONLY
Internal Financial Controls (IFC) Review
Get a quote
- IFC report
- control gap list
- remediation plan
REGISTRATION + COMPLIANCE CARE
Internal Financial Controls (IFC) Review + Compliance Care
Get a quote
+ ₹9,599/yr for year-one ROC compliance
- IFC report
- control gap list
- remediation plan
- Financial statements in Schedule III format
- Board report and AGM notice
- Filed AOC-4 with SRN
- Filed MGT-7 / MGT-7A with SRN
- Board and AGM minutes
500+
Companies incorporated
100%
CA/CS-signed filings
4.8/5
Founder rating
—A closer look
Understanding internal financial controls
Everything below is written for directors and finance teams — what internal financial controls are, when the auditor reports on them, and how to document and test them.
What are internal financial controls?
Internal financial controls (IFC) are the policies and procedures a company uses to make sure its business runs in an orderly way, its assets are safeguarded, fraud and errors are prevented and detected, its records are accurate and complete, and its financial information is reliable and timely.
The Companies Act, 2013 makes directors responsible for them, and requires the statutory auditor of many companies to report on whether the company has adequate IFC over financial reporting and whether they operated effectively. An IFC review documents, tests, and strengthens those controls.
The key terms
A few terms describe how IFC works:
- IFC over financial reporting
- Controls that make sure the financial statements are reliable. This is what the statutory auditor reports on.
- Auditor's IFC report
- Under Section 143(3)(i), the auditor reports on the adequacy and operating effectiveness of IFC over financial reporting.
- Private company exemption
- Auditors needn't report on IFC for private companies with turnover below ₹50 crore or borrowings below ₹25 crore, and for OPCs and small companies.
- Directors' responsibility
- Directors of listed companies state in their report that they've laid down adequate IFC that are operating effectively.
- Risk and control matrix
- A document listing each significant risk in a process and the control that addresses it.
- Design and operating effectiveness
- Whether a control is designed to address the risk, and whether it actually worked throughout the period.
- Material weakness
- A deficiency serious enough that a material misstatement might not be prevented or detected. It leads to an adverse IFC opinion.
A simple example
A Hyderabad engineering company's turnover crosses ₹50 crore, so its auditor must now report on IFC. The company documents its key processes — sales, purchases, payroll, inventory, and financial close — in risk and control matrices. Testing shows most controls work, but vendor bank details can be changed without approval, a known fraud risk. The company adds a maker-checker approval and retests it before year end, and the auditor issues an unmodified IFC opinion.
Why it matters
Strong controls protect the company and support the audit:
- Auditor reporting
- Once the exemption no longer applies, the auditor reports on IFC every year. Weak controls lead to a modified opinion.
- Directors' responsibility
- Directors are responsible for IFC, and for listed companies state so in their report.
- Fraud prevention
- Controls like approvals, segregation of duties, and reconciliations are the main defence against fraud.
- Reliable numbers
- Good controls mean fewer errors in the accounts and a faster close.
- Investor and lender comfort
- An adverse IFC opinion is a red flag in due diligence.
- Scaling
- Controls that worked informally in a small team break down as the company grows.
- Audit efficiency
- When controls can be relied on, the auditor can do less detailed testing.
Who is this for?
- Private companies crossing ₹50 crore turnover or ₹25 crore borrowings
- Public and listed companies, and their subsidiaries
- Companies that received an adverse or qualified IFC opinion
- Companies preparing for investment, listing, or acquisition
- Growing companies whose controls haven't kept up with their size
Our IFC review is separate from the statutory audit. The statutory auditor still forms its own opinion; our work helps the company be ready for it.
IFC review vs. internal audit vs. statutory audit
Three related but different activities:
| Aspect | IFC review | Internal audit | Statutory audit IFC report |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Document, test, and strengthen controls | Review processes, risks, and compliance | Independent opinion on IFC over financial reporting |
| For | Management and the board | Board or audit committee | Shareholders |
| Scope | Controls over financial reporting and key processes | Set by the board, often wider | Controls over financial reporting |
| Output | Risk and control matrices, test results, remediation plan | Audit findings and actions | IFC opinion in the audit report |
What we'll need from you
- Process owners
- Access to the people who run each key process.
- Policies and approvals
- Existing policies, delegation of authority, and approval matrices.
- System access
- Read access to the accounting system and user access lists.
- Previous audit reports
- Earlier statutory and internal audit observations.
- Financial statements
- The latest accounts, to identify significant accounts and processes.
- Sample documents
- Documents for testing, like purchase orders, invoices, and approvals.
Fees depend on the number of processes and locations and whether the work is first-time documentation or annual testing.
How an IFC review works
A first-time IFC exercise usually runs like this:
- 1
Scope
Significant accounts and the processes behind them are identified from the financial statements.
- 2
Document
Each process is walked through and documented, with risks and controls captured in risk and control matrices.
- 3
Assess design
Each control is assessed for whether it actually addresses its risk.
- 4
Test effectiveness
Controls are tested on samples to see whether they worked throughout the period.
- 5
Remediate
Gaps are fixed, with new or strengthened controls, and retested.
- 6
Report
The board receives a summary of the controls, test results, and any remaining deficiencies.
Keeping controls effective
IFC isn't a one-time exercise:
- Annual testing
- Retest key controls every year, since the auditor's opinion covers each year.
- Update for changes
- Update documentation when processes, systems, or people change.
- IT controls
- Review user access, changes to systems, and backups, which underpin many financial controls.
- Segregation of duties
- Make sure no one person can initiate, approve, and record the same transaction.
- Training
- Make sure process owners understand the controls they operate.
- Board oversight
- Report control status to the board or audit committee periodically.
Benefits and responsibilities
Benefits
- Controls documented and tested before the auditor reports
- Gaps found and fixed in time
- Lower fraud and error risk
- A cleaner IFC opinion
- Support for directors' responsibility statements
Responsibilities
- Nominate owners for each process
- Provide access to people, systems, and documents
- Fix gaps identified in the review
- Keep documentation current as processes change
- Test key controls each year
- Report control status to the board
—FAQ
Questions directors actually ask us
For most private companies, not until turnover reaches ₹50 crore or borrowings reach ₹25 crore. OPCs and small companies are exempt too. Public and listed companies generally aren't.